Talk:HD 40307 c
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Starstriker7 in topic Satellite stability
 | It is requested that an astronomy diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
 | HD 40307 c has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | ||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Satellite stability
editI'm not sure the reference given for the part on satellite stability can be used here: the reference specifically deals with Jupiter-type planets, which would (probably) not apply to HD 40307 c. The relevant part of the paper is on page 1092:
Planets with masses less than 0.3 MJup differ in radius, Qp, and interior structure from those with masses greater than 0.3 MJup. In addition, for lower planet masses the planet/satellite mass ratio increases beyond the assumption of nonsynchronization between the planet and the moon. For these reasons, we do not treat here the question of Earthlike satellites of ice-giant planets (Mp < 0.3 MJup).
Icalanise (talk) 10:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Then maybe it should be removed. When I placed the reference in there, as I could only read the abstract I drew the reference from what I read in the actual abstract. Hah, I didn't realize when writing science-related articles here I could be so inaccurate (I expanded HD 40307's planets beyond stub status, but BlueEarth and several others have been heavily correcting what I've put out). --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 22:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)