Talk:HD 40307 d/GA1

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Dana boomer in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Guess I'll do a clean sweep of your articles! I should have the full review up soon...

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    • In the Discovery section, you say "which functions through the by measuring". I think this needs to be tweaked a bit...
     Y Fixed --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • As with the other two articles, the SIMBAD ref needs to be formatted, and the end of the first paragraph of the Characteristics section needs a ref.
    Like with the others, I will work towards finding a reference. The Internet isn't proving very cooperative thus far. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
    And maybe it will never be this cooperative unless one of these planets hurls it's way into the Solar System in our lifetimes. Nutshell? I can't find anything...Should I just remove the information? --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 01:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
    The problem has been resolved by Icalanise. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 22:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

A couple of reference things and one prose tweak, so I'm putting this article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 22:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 22:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)Reply