Talk:HIV trial in Libya

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Josve05a in topic Copyright problem removed

No context for this trial provided

edit

I'm confused by the lack of explanation for what happened to warrant this trial. Without this context either as a section or its own dedicated page, a page on the trial doesn't seem merited to exist. 71.67.123.60 (talk) 21:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

30 August 2008 = sketchy details of Doctor Ashraf al-Hajuj judicial testimony in france

edit

dont rightly know what to do with this, in regards to adding it all into the main article,

in the article there are some details regarding the torture methods that have been disclosed, and afew other bits of information as well

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24266132-5003402,00.html CourierMail in Brisbane citing unamed french correspondents Prisoner claims torture, rape by dog From correspondents in Paris August 30, 2008 12:51pm

.... In his account to French judges, Doctor Ashraf al-Hajuj describes being raped by a german shepherd, having his nails ripped off and being given electric shocks.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.112.196 (talk) 07:18, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Polish nurses along with the Bulgarians

edit

The Rzeczpospolita newspaper published a report on that case, hidden for 10 years. A dozen Polish nurses were arrested by the Libyans with those 5 Bulgarian nurses, but they were expelled after the intervention of Polish Consul Krzysztof Czapla to Governor Abdullah Malik. They were friends, and also the Consul called Muammar al-Gaddafi's prejudice to Poles and his statement about the Polish nurses, whom he publicly admired. More about this (in Polish)- http://www.rp.pl/artykul/2,293546_Nieznany_sukces_naszej_dyplomacji.html Kowalmistrz (talk) 07:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tense?

edit

Was this written by a non native english speaker? The tense switches from present, to simple past, to present perfect. The whole article needs to be rewritten so the tense is consistent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.148.128 (talk) 06:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Recognition?

edit

The section on "the libyan recognition" is unclear about what was recognized, and the English-language source used as a cite doesn't actually talk about it. What was addressed in February 2011 - was it just an off-hand remark? 174.63.25.156 (talk) 16:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, this is unsourced and I could not easily find an actual reference. I'm removing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.44.45 (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on HIV trial in Libya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on HIV trial in Libya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on HIV trial in Libya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 89 external links on HIV trial in Libya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://media.nature.com/full/nature-assets/nature/journal/v443/n7114/extref/national_experts.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply