Talk:HMS Adamant (1780)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Don't capitalize in "Ordinary". A few too many "she"s; mix it up with the ship's name or "the ship"; most notably in the North America paragraph.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   What does this mean: Adamant was at first fitted for Ordinary? Use of the Template:Inflation might be nice, but it's certainly not required. Link Sheerness.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Issues fixed. Inflation not added since I'm not too knowledgeable on the template, though I agree it'd be a nice addition. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 20:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)