| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Adventure (1904) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Discrepancy?
editunder propulsion she is described as having oil fired steam. then under range it describes her coal capacity.??Toyokuni3 (talk) 17:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Good point, Jane's does not mention them being oil fired. I'll take that detail out. Benea (talk) 17:43, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Paid off
editi have encountered this term in several other british warship articles. i don't think too many readers, myself included, are completely aware of its meaning. i'm assuming it's a rough equivalent of what would be called in the u.s.n. 'decommissioned'.perhaps some explanation is in order?Toyokuni3 (talk) 15:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)