Talk:HMS Argus (I49)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 23:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• No disambiguarion links
• External links check ok
• Reference books there is Cheltenham, England for McCart and Tonbridge, Kent, UK for Sturtivant - for consistency they should be the same . I would suggest Cheltenham, UK and Tonbridge, UK leaving the county Kent out.
  • Agreed.
• The book Ships of the Royal Navy has both an ISBN ans a OCLC listed all the other just have an ISBN
  • That's a template that I'm reluctant to alter.
• In the Second World War section the paragraph starting Force H was recalled to the UK there are two red link operations Spotter and Picket- should they be linkd to Operation Spotter 1 and Operation Picket 1. It had to tell if its a 1 or an I?
  • It's a roman I and I figured to put both Spotter I and II in the same article as the second one was a repeat caused by the failure of the first.
• There is also the mixture of styles. In the lead World War I & II and as above Second World War for the section heading. Also World War I is used in the Design, description and construction section.
  • Fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

• • Ok finished review, a good article on a good ship, with some minor nit-picking points, well done. Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
    • GA passed Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2011 (UTC)