Talk:HMS Aurora (1887)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Dr. Blofeld in topic GA Review
Good articleHMS Aurora (1887) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 25, 2016Good article nomineeListed


GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Aurora (1887)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 08:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


  • "Aurora participate in Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee Fleet review" -participated.
    • Good catch.
  • What is the source for all that infobox data?
    • Everything in the infobox is sourced in the main body. Or at least it's supposed to be; if not let me know.

Very little to pick on, a very sound entry Sturmvogel 66Dr. Blofeld 11:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Sound job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply