Talk:HMS Bellerophon (1786)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 23:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC) Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process. I've read Cordingly's book myself although some years ago now and I well know how difficult it is when working with a detailed and complicated topic to ensure that you've achieved the correct balance between detail and accessibility - I think you've done a very good job here.

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

• Its a minor cosmetic point, but the "First commission" section is very short to have a level 2 heading - with the picture of Pasley there as well it looks a little untidy. Could this be made a subheading of "Construction and commissioning" or perhaps integrated into the section below?

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)