This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Defender (H07) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ships/Guidelines#Referring_to_ships says "You may give the ship's prefix the first time you introduce the ship, but you should not repeat it on future mentions. You need not give the prefix at all if it is obvious from the context (for example, in a list of ships of the Royal Navy there is no need to repeat "HMS" each time)" (my emphasis). I think it's pretty clear here that ship names are all "HMS" - and when we're talking about Australian ships, that's already made clear too. I removed them because it's such a burden to read the text with them in, and I don't think our guidelines say anything that prohibits that - in particular, they don't say that every ship must be referred to as "HMS" at first use. Shem (talk) 22:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Well, after considerable thought, I would suggest that it makes for easier reading, and that's my driver here. Good work, by the way, both here and at Diana, Sturmvogel. Shem (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your kind words. I'm reconsidering my general policy, BTW, based on your comments, because the ship names are rather liberally splattered all over this article. My habit may well be better suited for more occasional use.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
.svg)
