Talk:HMS Dreadnought (1875)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review
HMS Dreadnought (1875) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 21, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Dreadnought (1875)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Photos are good to go
- 2 dupe links
- Add commissioning year to the infobox
- There's a Harv error in the reference list.
Not much to ding you on. Parsecboy (talk) 17:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- How can there be a harv error when I don't use harv format? The only thing that I've used that's not bog-standard is the format for the Brown book since I've only got the epub version. Can you tell me what the issue is, since I don't have the script for the harv checks installed? Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, it's from the {{Winfield}} ref - you'll have to copy it in by hand instead of using the template. Parsecboy (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Or perhaps it's a meaningless error message because it's invisible to the reader.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- A fair point. No doubt someone would raise an objection at ACR/FAC, but I doubt you have aspirations of taking this article there. Parsecboy (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Or perhaps it's a meaningless error message because it's invisible to the reader.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, it's from the {{Winfield}} ref - you'll have to copy it in by hand instead of using the template. Parsecboy (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)