Talk:HMS Empress of India
(Redirected from Talk:HMS Empress of India (1891))
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
 | HMS Empress of India has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | HMS Empress of India is part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Sinking
editD.K. Brown give notes on the Lyme Bay practice shoot & the statement that the outcome was swift or surprising seems rather contrary to the details; the ship was hit by 95+ shells, of which 44 were modern 12 inch or 13.5 inch common. After such a pasting the ship is noted as "blazing furiously", yet still took 1 hr 45 minto sink! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.75.48.5 (talk) 11:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have checked Burt, Brown and the diving website, and rewritten the section.
- I am not sure whether I should have mentioned that the diagram in Brown showed her 13.5-in guns present, and the diving site says they are not present in the wreck now; the inference being that they must have been removed in salvage - the inference being that they must have been removed during salvage - I would like a source to specifically state that the 13.5-in guns were salvaged.--Toddy1 (talk) 10:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Empress of India/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 12:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Will take this one. Parsecboy (talk) 12:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Do dupe links, licenses check out
- You might clarify in the box that the displacement given is standard, not full load
- Seems a little odd to go back and forth between describing Empress of India's characteristics and that of the class (i.e., "her" vs. "their")
- Yeah, I've recently been moving more to a generic description for the description to make it easier to copy over to the other ships of the class.
- Gun turrets? The Royal Sovereigns carried their guns in barbette mounts (save Hood, of course)
- Good catch.
- Should "International Squadron" be capitalized?
- It does refer to a specific organization, so I think it's a proper noun.
- The last paragraph of the Construction and career section needs a citation.
- "A big hole extant in her side..." - extant seems redundant here.
- Think I've gotten all of these, see if anything doesn't suit. Thanks for reviewing this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)