Talk:HMS Fearless (H67)/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 14:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Will get to this one shortly. Parsecboy (talk) 14:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- No dupe links
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- You might want to add a photo of a SM.79 to the last section - readers might be interested in the type of aircraft that sank the ship. This one might be a good choice, given that it's carrying a torpedo in the photo.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Nothing to hold up promotion, great work. Parsecboy (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)