This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Fury (H76) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
HMS Fury (H76) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 30, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from HMS Fury (H76) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 December 2007, and was viewed approximately 8,500 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Fury (H76)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Will do this soon. JAGUAR 16:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- "HMS Fury was an F-class destroyer built for the Royal Navy in the 1930s" - could be more specific, was it not 1933?
- "By July 1942, a Type 286 short-range surface-search radar" - de-link this if not notable
- "Photos taken of the ship in July 1944 show her with a Type 271 radar mounted on her searchlight platform that was probably installed during her last refit" - this sentence needs a citation
- "The ship cost 248,538 pounds" - why not £248,538?
- "before beginning a brief refit on the Humber." - link the Humber
- "On the night of 15/16 November she bombarded Leros with the destroyers Exmoor and ORP Krakowiak[42] On" - missing full stop
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The assertions regarding the cameramen could be original research, but both candidates are included in the reference given.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Another well researched article that has nothing to major enough to constitute it being put on hold. I noticed a few minor prose issues, but they can be addressed any time. JAGUAR 21:08, 30 January 2016 (UTC)