Talk:HMS Gloucester (62)/GA1
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Miyagawa in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 15:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Grabbing for a review. Miyagawa (talk) 15:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Design and description: "Gloucester was displaced 9,400 long tons" you can drop the "was"
- Link beam to Beam (nautical)
- Not sure I'm understanding "The ship's complement was 800–15 officers and ratings" - was the complement between 800 and 815, or the crazily unlikely notion that there was 800 officers and 15 ratings?
- Cite #22 needs to be filled out fully.
That's all I've got. Placing on hold. Miyagawa (talk) 16:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- All done. Thanks for doing this so promptly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- Great, happy to promote on that basis. Miyagawa (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)