Talk:HMS Grenville (H03)

HMS Grenville (H03) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 25, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Grenville (H03)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 20:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Can you find any more sources about this ship?
Sure, but they don't have as much detail as the ones used.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
So you would get no new information by using those other sources? Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 17:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Exactly. She had such a short life that there's not much coverage on her, unlike her sisters.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Are there any photos or diagram of the ship?
Not for her, but I added one for her sister.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Not even a diagram? Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 17:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Nothing that's not copyrighted.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I've added another source.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've asked for a second opinion. While on paper it should pass, my gut is telling me different. Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 05:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to pass it. Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 02:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic