Talk:HMS Harvester (H19)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 08:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• The ISBN for Friedman, Norman (2009) needs attention its giving the error message he given ISBN does not appear to be valid; check for errors copying from the original source. on the checker
  • Fixed.
• Citation 6 and 7 to Wiser but the book appears to be named Winser presumably ones a typo
  • Fixed.
• Is there a cite for the Pennant number H19 is not in the text, but mentioned in the inf box and of course the article title
  • Done.

• • Almost a shame to put on hold, just the three small points (and the last ones really nit picking)Jim Sweeney (talk) 21:31, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)