Talk:HMS Hasty (H24)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by SMasters in topic GA Review
Good articleHMS Hasty (H24) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 24, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 21, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the British destroyer HMS Hasty (pictured) captured the German blockade runner SS Morea in the North Atlantic on 12 February 1940 en-route from the South Atlantic to the UK to refit?

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Hasty (H24)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    There were numerous punctuation issues but I have fixed them. Otherwise, the article is well written and complies to MOS requirements.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Article is properly referenced with reliable sources and has no original research.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Article covers all major aslects and is focused.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Article complies to WP:NPOV.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Article is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Images are correctly tagged.
  7. Overall: Aside from some minor punctuation issues (if you can't read a whole sentence without running out of breath, you need a comma somewhere!), which I have fixed, the article complies to all the requirements for a GA, and I am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Pass/Fail: