HMS Hasty (H24) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 21, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the British destroyer HMS Hasty (pictured) captured the German blockade runner SS Morea in the North Atlantic on 12 February 1940 en-route from the South Atlantic to the UK to refit? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Hasty (H24)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Article is properly referenced with reliable sources and has no original research.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Article covers all major aslects and is focused.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article complies to WP:NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images are correctly tagged.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Aside from some minor punctuation issues (if you can't read a whole sentence without running out of breath, you need a comma somewhere!), which I have fixed, the article complies to all the requirements for a GA, and I am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: