Talk:HMS Hawkins (D86)
HMS Hawkins (D86) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 21, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Hawkins (D86) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HMS Hawkins (D86). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100501203705/http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/lloydtriestino.htm to http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/lloydtriestino.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Hawkins (D86)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
I will review, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 08:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Design and description - inconsistency with infobox wrt to displacement at deep load
- Design and description - Their crew.. should be "Her crew" since the discussion at this point is about the ship, not the class. Also the complement number differs here to what is in the infobox
- Design and description - the armour thickness in the text is given in mm but in the infobox as cm
- Construction and career - this may be a terminology thing in respect of recommissioned, but shouldn't there be a "was" in the middle here: Hawkins recommissioned... Also suggest explicitly stating recommissioned as a heavy cruiser, as per the infobox.
- British books on warships often omit the helping verbs like was for some reason.
- Wartime service - Is there a link for British invasion of Italian Somaliland? It is more specific a name than the East African Campaign used in the lead.
- No link.
- Sources - Campbell listed but not cited. Also location of publisher inconsistency for some sources.
- Image tags look OK, no dupe links
That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 23:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- All done, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- OK, passing as GA now since I believe the article meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 20:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Nil desperandum: HMS Hawkins, flagship of the East Indies station: being an attempt to enliven the memory of all who served in HMS Hawkins between September 1932 and March 1935
editA book by the ship's chaplain: Edgar Rae. Springnuts (talk) 22:40, 20 October 2022 (UTC)