Talk:HMS Minotaur (1906)/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The prose says 779 officers and men, but the infobox says 802 - which is the correct number?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Everything else looks to be in order, just the discrepancy between the crew size numbers. Good work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. Fixed the crew size; copy-paste error from Defense.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:22, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I figured it was something like that. Passing now. Parsecboy (talk) 23:08, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply