Talk:HMS Neptune (1797)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk • contribs • count) 14:35, 9 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Nicely done, but some presentation issues need to be resolved.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   No bullets in infobox as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines. Not required, but add publisher location and fix capitalization in Lavery's subtitle.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Consolidate refs, forex cites 2 and 3 at the end of the Mutiny at the Nore section will suffice for the entire paragraph.

   I despise your citation style, but it's not incorrect.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: