Talk:HMS Royal Oak (1892)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 13:56, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

I'll aim to get to this on the weekend. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:56, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Toolbox checks -- no dab or EL issues.

Prose/content/structure -- please check I haven't altered meaning with my (fairly minor) copyedit; only thing outstanding is that the data for the torpedo tubes seems to differ a fair bit between text and infobox, so some reconciliation might be necessary.

Images/sources -- no concerns.

Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your edits look fine, although I'm not sure that the issue is with the torpedo tubes. She had seven when completed and four of them were removed in 1902. Do I need to rephrase that for clarity?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Sorry mate, for some reason I didn't see your response highlighted in my watchlist -- the discrepancy doesn't seem to be in the number but in the size of tubes -- 14-in in the text and 18-in in the infobox... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

D'oh! Fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Cool -- passing now. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)