 | HMS Shalimar has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 4, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Shalimar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
edit1. Prose 
On hold
2. Verifiability On hold
3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
6. Illustrations ✓ Pass
7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass
Comments
edit1.
- Consider linking minesweeper
- Be consistent with Strait of Malacca and Malacca Strait; unless I'm an idiot and they're different bodies of water, the name used should be consistent. You also use Straits of Malacca
- "then sank a coaster two day later" --> "then sank a coaster two days later"
2.
- The final paragraph of the article is completely uncited.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Good work, placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 23:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done all. Will be doing your review soon. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)