Talk:HMS Surly (1806)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Yoninah in topic Did you know nomination
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Surly (1806) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from HMS Surly (1806) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Royal Navy cutter HMS Surly carried almost £96,000 in coin between Dublin and London in 1825? "to Lieutenant H. Wollnough for d* at the rate of 1/2 percent on £95,950 10s 3d, the estimated value of specie conveyed in HMS Surly from Dublin to London and from London to Dublin in the months of August and September 1825." from: Journals of the House of Commons Volume 81. H.M. Stationery Office. 1826. p. 429.
- ALT1:... that the crew of the Royal Navy cutter HMS Surly helped to suppress seamen's strikes on the Rivers Tyne and Wear in the 1820s? "ordered to the river Wear to assist the civil power in repressing an outbreak among the seamen who had struck for higher wages ... his success was so great that before long he was similarly employed at Shields" from: The United Service Magazine Volume 127. H. Colburn. 1871. pp. 184–185.
- Reviewed: Last credit from Template:Did you know nominations/Chilocorus cacti
Created by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 08:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough (just), well-cited, hook directly cited. Good to go. Minor suggestion, not DYK related, "... of coin" is perhaps a UK-ish term? Is this referring to physical coins, money in general, or something specific like the pay for the seamen? Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Maury Markowitz, come to think of it I think "in coin" is probably more common and have made that change to ALT0. I was just looking for an alternative to "of specie" which is a bit jargonny for me. It would have been physical coinage (specie means money in the form of coins, rather than banknotes), I presume it was probably pay they were carrying for Navy establishments in Ireland or possibly funds for the governor of Ireland - Dumelow (talk) 06:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)