This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
A fact from HMS Surly (1855) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
New articles that were moved to mainspace on 9 November 2020 are 3,106 and 2,450 characters, respectively, and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected in either article [1][2] and no close paraphrasing issues spotted (AGF scanned refs which can't go through Dup detector). Articles are well-sourced. Hook is 127 characters long (ALT1 is 124); both are under the 200 character max. limit and are interesting. Ref by Winfield used in both articles (verifying both the hook and ALT1) is a reliable source (AGF as there is no preview available). Both QPQs done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 15:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply