Talk:HMS Unrivalled
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Unrivalled article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
HMS Unrivalled has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Typo?
editThere is a double period after Paola A.
- Fixed. Thanks for catching that.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:41, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Last two years of World War II
editWhere did this sub operate from during the last two years of World War II? Even if she didn't sink any ships in this period, where she was located should be mentioned. Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I can't answer that. She was probably in the Med, but sources mention that a number of the class became training subs late in the war, without mentioning which ones.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Unrivalled (P45)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 23:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose: (MoS):
- prose: (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
-
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
edit1. HMS Unrivalled (P45) was a U-class submarine built for the Royal Navy during World War II. Suggest - A comma after submarine.
- No comma needed, IMO.
- Oops, my bad.
2. but was too slow for requirements and not retained after the war. Suggest - but was too slow for requirements and was not retained after the war.
- Good catch. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Passed Thurgate (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HMS Unrivalled. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070711191533/http://home.cogeco.ca/~gchalcraft/sm/page28.html to http://home.cogeco.ca/~gchalcraft/sm/page28.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)