Talk:HMS Weazel (1805)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Acad Ronin in topic Orphaned references in HMS Weazel (1805)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Orphaned references in HMS Weazel (1805)
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of HMS Weazel (1805)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Winfield":
- From HMS Penguin (1813): Winfield (2008), p. 304.
- From HMS Sophie (1809): Winfield. British Warships of the Age of Sail. p. 285.
- From HMS Belette (1814): Winfield (2008), p.306.
- From HMS Racehorse (1806): Winfield (2008), pp.293-4.
- From HMS Pickle (1800): Winfield (2008), p.358.
- From HMS Hecate (1809): Winfield (2008), pp.300-1.
- From HMS Elk (1804): Winfield (2008), p.204.
- From Cruizer class brig-sloop: Winfield (2008), pp. 282 & 291.
- From HMS Ringdove (1806): Winfield (2008), pp.296-7.
- From HMS Sappho (1806): Winfield (2008), p.297.
- From HMS Primrose (1807): Winfield (2008), p.296.
- From HMS Forester (1806): Winfield (2008), pp. 294-5.
- From HMS Eclipse (1807): Winfield (2008), p.298.
- From HMS Surinam (1805): Winfield (2008), p.292.
- From HMS Fairy (1812): Winfield (2008), p.301.
- From HMS Scout (1804): Winfield (2008), p. 291.
- From HMS Reindeer (1804): Winfield (2008), p.294.
- From HMS Pelorus (1808): Winfield (2008), p.299.
- From HMS Mutine (1806): Winfield (2008), p.295.
- From HMS Persian (1809): Winfield (2008), p.300.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- I believe that I have fixed the problem.Acad Ronin (talk) 02:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)