Wikipedia

Talk:HNK Hajduk Split

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Koreanovsky in topic Away colors
Learn more about this page


Drazen Muzinic

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I recently set up a page for Drazen Muzinic who played for a while in England. However, I have not been able to get many details of his time with Hajduk Split, and information about him generally is difficult to get hold of! If anyone has any career information that they could add to his article, then please do so. Thanks! User:Demonicanglian 20:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oldest club?

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm removing the bit about Hajduk being Croatia's oldest club. Slaven Belupo from Koprivnica was founded four yeasr earlier, in 1907. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.10.50.73 (talk) 09:29:48, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

Actually, HNK Segesta is the oldest Croatian football club, established in 1906. Timbouctou (talk) 03:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Shouldn't the official logo have 19 11 instead of the four white lines on its sides? --DIREKTOR (TALK) 10:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's usually a contentious subject, but since the official website has the lines, it seems like a safer bet.--Thewanderer (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I see, thanks. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 22:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
So I'm not going crazy? I always thought the 1911 shirts were authentic and the lines were counterfit, who knows. 66.183.85.242 (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually the club can be seen using both versions (for instance the logo in their official web pages has lines, while the giant one painted on the seats at Poljud and the one painted at their offices still features the 1911 digits. Timbouctou (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Molim?

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

"It was the second most successful club in Yugoslavia far outstripping the third, its present day rival, Dinamo Zagreb." What the...?! The two Belgrade teams won more titles, which certainly makes Hajduk third, and Dinamo fourth. And they didn't really outstrip Dinamo, after WW2 Hajduk won 7 titles compared to Dinamo's 4. They did win another two titles in the old Yugoslavia, but neither Dinamo, Red Star or Partizan existed back then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhelja (talk • contribs) 00:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

He is right. Do something about it. You cant use some fanatic source that states that. Even the sentence "its the only club with supporters of all nationalities" is not correct. I have been in various regions of ex Yugoslavia and Red Star and specially Partizan can also say that. Lets not lie. Hajduk is a great club and dosn´t need this kind of megalomania. OK? FkpCascais (talk) 02:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Honours

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You should include in the honours section that Hajduk won the championship of Banovina Croatia in 1941 and the championship of Socialist Republic of Croatia in 1946. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.129.96.21 (talk) 16:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

...

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You should include in the honours section that Hajduk won the championship of Banovina Croatia in 1941 and the championship of Socialist Republic of Croatia in 1946. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.129.90.145 (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copy editing

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have again restored the maintenance template. User:Sexymisterr was blocked in the past for removing this without addressing the issue, and has done so again. Text such as "80s and have been offered less success in the country (no title), " as currently present in the article, is not English, and needs attention. Greenman (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Popularity

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A controversial issue such as which club is the most popular in Croatia should NOT be based on a 6 years old article from a news website whose standard can be questionable, about a poll based upon an unknown number of people, without any true references to the findings. I'm changing the sentence to state "one of the two most popular clubs in Croatia" which is true, and won't annoy anyone except for fanatics on both sides. Zlopseto 16:14 22 May 2011 (UTC)

OK but if you choose the wording "one of the two most popular clubs" you are also supposed to tell the reader which club is the other one. Regards. Timbouctou (talk) 15:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Relegation

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"The 1960s were some of the hardest times in Hajduk's history, iincluding one occasion when they were relegated to the second league, but not for long."


This is not true, Hajduk was never relegated from the top divison. I'm removing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.253.230.99 (talk) 15:18, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

owners

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this article should mention that the city council are the majority owners of the team, and that Hajduk Split is financially broke, with the council pumping in 5 million euro — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.124.151 (talk) 03:45, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

The club isnt financialy broke its just in a money crisis and the city didnt give any money.The banks gave a 30 million kuna credit and if Hajduk doesnt pay it back in 1 year then the city must pay the credit.((TorcaST))

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on HNK Hajduk Split. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on HNK Hajduk Split. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on HNK Hajduk Split. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on HNK Hajduk Split. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Away colors

edit
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The new away colors got presented aswell: [1]. Can someone add them too? --Koreanovsky (talk) 11:22, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:HNK_Hajduk_Split&oldid=1258092478"