Talk:HQ-7
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re-wrote & re-formatted the article -- Adeptitus 23:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Added a "citation required" tag for two reasons:
- This opinion does need a citation.
- The existence of a long range SAM does not invalidate the need for a shorter one, especially the HQ-9, which is supposedly cursed with a ridiculously high min alt (for a modern long range SAM) of 500m, which would render it rather useless against seaskimmers, and would explain why they are still buying Russian SAMs. Kazuaki Shimazaki 00:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Agreed -- opinion line removed. -- Adeptitus 22:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
HQ-61?
editIs the HQ-61 mentioned a typo for HQ-16 HongQi 16? ComputerGeezer (talk) 17:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on HQ-7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060510173545/http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hq7naval.asp to http://sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hq7naval.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060510171553/http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq7.asp to http://sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq7.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)