Talk:HTC Dream/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zach Vega (talk · contribs) 00:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

My initial impression with this article is that it's very strong, but my opinion often changes as I get further into the review.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   The lead section needs to talk about the hardware and go into the software a little bit more.

   ...And it now does.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   The refs are a mess. The dates are inconsistent in format, there's dead links, and work and publisher are mixed up all the time.

   Some problems remain, but much better.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Yes, it's good with scope.

   B. Focused:

   Pretty good job on this.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   No edit wars or vandalism. Good.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   All images are from Wikimedia Commons.

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   You have a photo of the phone running Android 1.6, and a photo of Android 1.6. Redundant much? Also, try to find one or two more photos. This isn't required to pass GAN, just a nice addition.

   This can be dealt with outside of the GAN.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   The article is going pretty well, it's just that we have a few more issues to take care of. Zach Vega (talk to me) 00:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

   Fixed. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:30, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

   Good job on improving the article! Zach Vega (talk to me) 19:00, 19 October 2013 (UTC)