Talk:Habeas corpus in the United States
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Habeas corpus in the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Peoples Opinions
editWho's the genius who put quotes around war on terror?
- Wasn't Bush, he's too busy destroying the country and turning it into a nightmare state. Hopefully the next president will work to fix things, otherwise, it's time to get the hell out before they decide Gonzo's right and habeas corpus isn't expressly granted to everyone. Scary stuff.
Isn't this article missing FDR's ordering of Japanese-American internship during WWII? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.119.94 (talk) 21:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Should the article include the May 21, 2010 Fadi Al Maqaleh v. Robert M. Gates (Consolidated) ruling? A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a prior ruling on 3 habeas petitioners being held as enemy combatants at the Bagram Theater Internment Facility [1][2][3]Pndupont (talk) 00:59, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/0471E6B4F164929085257807007002E8/$file/09-5265-1245894.pdf
- ^ https://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/0471E6B4F164929085257807007002E8/$file/09-5265-1245894.pdf
- ^ http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2010/05/outoftheater-capture-or-why-maqalehs-narrow-reasoning-sweeps-so-broadly.html
Senate vote on amendement S#2022 Fails
editSenator Joseph R Biden, Jr said: “Habeas corpus was conceived to prevent someone from being locked up illegally, with no chance to contest his/her imprisonment. It is not a get out of jail free card. And it will not result in the release of dangerous terrorists," ... "As I’ve said before, the terrorists win when we abandon our civil liberties. The way we win is to show them that we can fight this war without changing our character as a nation. I hope the Senate reconsiders this issue once again.” source Jeff Carr 17:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Common Exceptions to Habeas Corpus in US
editIndividuals stalked and harassed with psychological warfare methods to provoke an incident leading to a complaint to a judge to place the individual into the mental health system. The victim is not provided a lawyer, does not see the original complaint, nor is allowed to speak to the judge. The harassment practice has now been expanded to using technological tools, like the microwave/ultrasound crowd control devices. Case in point: the capitol city shooter, who did make the claim his original trip to the capitol was to stop the 'radio waves' was deemed unfit for trial. Yet anyone who understood how these devices can be used for torture and sleep depravation should see the inherit flaw in justice when claims of 'radio waves' are deemed evidence of mental illness when in fact such devices exist.
Interment of elderly people in long term care facilities upon the complaint of a family member, although a hearing is done, and a lawyer allowed, a lawyer is commonly not present to defend the elderly victim as a lawyer is not required by law to defend the interests of the elderly. 71.114.183.105 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 04:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
I have asked people to move most USA detail in Habeas corpus to Habeas corpus in the United States. Ex parte Quirin should be included because that is very important USA court case, because that is the first precedent of identifying unlawful combatant and trial them by military commission.--Kittyhawk2 (talk) 17:13, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Habeas corpus in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080111110628/http://teachingamericanhistorymd.net/000001/000000/000017/html/t17.html to http://teachingamericanhistorymd.net/000001/000000/000017/html/t17.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130015955/http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ClosureOfGuantanamoDetentionFacilities/ to http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ClosureOfGuantanamoDetentionFacilities/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070705042710/http://www.uscourts.gov/Press_Releases/caseload031307.html to http://www.uscourts.gov/Press_Releases/caseload031307.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822022222/http://tides.sfasu.edu/ to http://tides.sfasu.edu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Habeas corpus in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070627170450/http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/fhcrcscc.pdf to http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/fhcrcscc.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060905000247/http://tides.sfasu.edu/AN18/SHHIV_40.php?culture=2&chrono=5&index=0 to http://tides.sfasu.edu/AN18/SHHIV_40.php?culture=2&chrono=5&index=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)