Talk:Habib Noh
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cielquiparle in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Singapore may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | A fact from Habib Noh appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 February 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a teenager planned to blow up the tomb of Islamic saint Habib Noh because it was "un-Islamic"?
Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 19:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Habib Noh, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Article is new enough and long enough. Passes earwig and is adequately sourced. No close paraphrasing was found, and the hook is interesting, cited inline, and verified. QPQ done. Nom good to go. Pseud 14 (talk) 22:11, 3 February 2023 (UTC)