Talk:Hacking Health

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because the article wasn't meant to be promotional whatsoever but rather informational and encyclopedic. I've been looking at other organization's Wikipedia articles and they seem to have more 'tabs' explaining how the organization started etc. Would that be something that would neutralize the article and make it more encyclopedic? Any help would be greatly appreciated - but kindly hold off the speedy deletion. Thanks. --Shreyatek (talk) 19:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --208.54.80.252 (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

The Hacking Health events are an amazing concept. I see no reason why an article describing them should be deleted. More people should know about Hacking Health and this article does that job well.

The question is not whether the events are amazing or not, but whether it have enough notoriety. I do think it should be okay, since it's now an international project with press cover for a few years now. --Psychoslave (talk) 14:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because everything summarize in this document is verifiable and based on actual events in different cities. Please let us know how this document violates any wikipedia rules. --184.162.241.250 (talk) 21:06, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

This page should not be deleted because...

This page should not be deleted because major changes have been made to turn the article into more of an encyclopedic entry. The kind of information included is neutral and factual. It is also based on the same content structure used by Startup Weekend and other similar groups/organizations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shreyatek (talk • contribs) 14:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hacking Health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150725131806/http://www.marsdd.com/news-and-insights/hacking-health-toronto-2013-mars-wraps-up/ to http://www.marsdd.com/news-and-insights/hacking-health-toronto-2013-mars-wraps-up/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150725105853/http://www.humanipo.com/news/38627/innovative-healthcare-initiative-launched-in-cape-town/ to http://www.humanipo.com/news/38627/innovative-healthcare-initiative-launched-in-cape-town/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150725122253/https://www.pwc.co.za/en/press-room/mobile-health.jhtml/ to https://www.pwc.co.za/en/press-room/mobile-health.jhtml/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)