Talk:Hadith of Golden Chain/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Shii in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Shii (talk · contribs) 21:26, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


I appreciate the effort on this important article about a major subject that people will look to Wikipedia for, however, it is not written in a fashion that conveys information clearly to people unfamiliar with Islam.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    This article's prose must be rewritten to make it basic good English. I may have the time to help you with this, but probably not.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    The first paragraph of the article should describe what the hadith is about and why it is important. It does none of these things.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    The article does not describe the impact of the hadith and why it is so important to Shiites.
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
    The pictures are the best part of the article, good work.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Please continue expanding this article. Thank you for your work