Talk:Hadley Junior High School
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you need help
editI, and another editor, recently fixed up this page. Unfortunately, there isn't enough material online to add anything more to this article without the help of people who know more about it. If you're a student, teacher, or parent (or otherwise) who knows about this school, help us out! Add some more information to this page - including logos and pictures, especially. If you need help with anything, click on my name below, and then press the "talk" tab, and leave a message.
Thanks! --Haemo 02:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Banning of The Perks of Being a Wallflower
editThis material has been repeatedly removed by Wikiwiki65 (talk · contribs). I reverted initially due to the removal being an unexplained blanking of cited content. In the most recent removal, they provide a statement of "No longer relevant" ... but have not explained why it's no longer relevant. I asked on their user-page, but no response as yet. Here's the text being removed:
- On April 29, 2013, the Glen Ellyn School District 41 Board of Education voted 4-2 to ban The Perks of Being a Wallflower from Hadley Junior High School, despite a review committee of teachers and administrators recommending that the book be allowed to stay on school shelves.[1]
- The board's decision has been opposed by many Hadley students, who have asked the board to reconsider the ban.[2] The censorship has also angered many Hadley teachers, such as literacy teacher Lynn Bruno,[3] and parents of Hadley students. Alumni of the junior high school have also organized in opposition to the ban.[4]
- ^ Placek, Christopher. "Glen Ellyn Dist. 41 parents debate pulling ‘Wallflower’ from school shelves." Daily Herald, 10 May 2013.
- ^ Eriksen, Charlotte. "Students Ask D41 Officials to Reconsider 'Perks of Being a Wallflower' Removal." Glen Ellyn Patch, 7 May 2013.
- ^ Eriksen, Charlotte. "District 41 Bans 'The Perks of Being a Wallflower.'" Glen Ellyn Patch, 1 May 2013.
- ^ An alumna founded this website to organize efforts to reverse the ban.
If no further explanation is provided then I'll be restoring the material. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- I did a search and found two news stories saying that the school board has reversed their decision; so I think that's why it's being removed. But, it's still a notable event, given the broad coverage it received as well as acknowledgement that the school board "garnered input from as far away as Australia."[1] Given the coverage, I think a one paragraph mention that the event occured and that it was reversed as a result of a "public outcry for the book's return."[2] would still be appropriate within the article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hadley Junior High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100131084551/http://www.d41.dupage.k12.il.us/history.htm to http://www.d41.dupage.k12.il.us/history.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100509071643/http://www.d41.dupage.k12.il.us/vision.htm to http://www.d41.dupage.k12.il.us/vision.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)