Talk:Hae Mo-su of Buyeo
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates for Hae Mo-su's life?
editThe article has conflicting dates, when relating with the wiki page on Jumong. Hae Mosu is said here to have died in 195BC, while his supposed son Go Jumong is said to have died at 39 years of age in 19BC. This leaves a gap between his death and Go Jumong's birth of approximately 174 years. Either the date is wrong or the conjecture that he is the father of Go Jumong is wrong, or both.Ken Whitmore (talk) 12:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.134.9.247 (talk)
Hae Mosu is a Mythological figure. He was euhemerized into a mortal chieftain. Either that, or he was a mortal chieftain from ancient times who had a legend spring up around him. His long lifespan, in this context, is only as bizarre as the lifespan of any biblical figure. However, this article definitely needs an overhaul discussing the mythological origins of Hae Mosu.
This article has no clear dates for Hae Mo-su's birth, ascention to the throne, or death. Readers need this information to get a better idea of his life and times. Anyone have this information? Thomas Lessman (talk) 08:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
editI've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)