Talk:Hagia Sophia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Viriditas (talk · contribs) 02:17, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Criteria

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   At least one explicit citation needed tag, however, a large percentage of the article is currently unsourced. This includes quotations and statistics. This article is simply not ready for a GA nomination. Please seek peer review or contact the relevant WikiProjects for assistance. Viriditas (talk) 02:45, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   Images are not distributed evenly throughout the article.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Quick-fail due to egregious sourcing problem. Please re-nominate after adding sources for quotations and statistics. I have not checked for potential copyright infringements. Viriditas (talk) 02:45, 27 July 2014 (UTC)