Talk:Hail to the Thief/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 04:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:18, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Review will be posted here within 48 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:18, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose good, complies sufficiently with MoS. I made one minor copy-edit.[1]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Sources appear to be RS, spotchecks show statements supported by sources, no evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Good coverage without unnecessary trivia.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Captioned and with suitable fair use rationales. You could include a fair use sample of a song or two, but not GA criteria.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, this is all in order, happy to list this as a GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)