Talk:Hakea neospathulata

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Western Australia / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Hakea neospathulata is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Internal referencing

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

This article should be referenced by the Wikidata item Q42890295 but is not. It appears to have linked to the wikidata item Q55433280 (also named Hakea neospathulata)... Perhaps we need help from someone with a bit more knowledge of wikidata?? I am concerned that by linking to one rather than the otherm any other language links when they are created will not automatically link to the English article. MargaretRDonald (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

It is unusual that both are linked, @Cygnis insignis:, can you shed any light? Hughesdarren (talk) 01:36, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

One was a duplicate that was redirected to the older item, Q42890295, so I removed that. Everything should be in order, but let me know if it isn't. cygnis insignis 02:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Cheers, looks fixed now. Thanks! Hughesdarren (talk) 05:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic