Talk:Hal Anderson

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Edited the 5th paragraph in an attempt to create a more "neutral" version while maintaining the original point. ~Ruckus~ Brance 21:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good job Kyle, you stick it to the man by vandalising public web sites. -Tachyon out!

HOw is what i wrote vandalism?? i dont get it. Explain why the last part of these comments about Hal Anderson is not vandalism. Im not trying to 'vandalise' anything. I understand that this site is not intended to be a public forum to express personal opinions. And that is the only reason for what i put. I will not post again, but hope that you consider removing those opinions from the site. Thanks for your time. - Kyle out!!

- I am the one who wrote the original political based comment. I don't see it as vandalism because in no way am I criticizing Hal Anderson. I live in Winnipeg and listen to the Wheeler and Hal Show on a regular basis, including during the time of this vote and thus know that someone put Hal in the competition as a joke. This prompted the two hosts to see if they could throw the vote by getting as many people to vote as possible. It was a joke from the beginning and shows exactly how an organized group can (not an opinion) throw a democratic vote. Hal Anderson, has not contributed to Canadian history, has not defined Canadian identity and does not deserve to be on that list. It's a mockery that he would try in the first place and an embarrassment that enough people cared to ruin the purpose of the vote by voting for him. Political propaganda, depending on your sensitivity to such thing, maybe, but it is on a page where the primary point is his "achievement" of being the 34th greatest Canadian. If you really want to get dirty, the comment has been there through enough edits and checks to show that the admins of Wikipedia consider it legitimate. - Sean


Hal's still watching

edit

This article was mentioned mere minutes ago on the Wheeler & Hal show. Expect a fresh batch of vandals to close in soon.

Hal also recommended including a note about the "Epic Empire" video game skit in lieu of the entirely unfounded "DDR Hal Anderson 2006" mentioned here. --Dasyati 13:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hal Anderson. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hal Anderson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply