It was clear that the original article was not written by a native English speaker, so I fixed that and got to the point of what they were saying (which was correct in the previous version also)

edit

I fixed that all, and I get pinged for doing so, I suppose until someone tells me otherwise it is apparent that IPs are not human editors. The amount of arrogance and general bastardy to unnecessarily drag things to ANI is why people like me don't want accounts here. As per the field manual, if something isn't broken then fix it. It is somewhat interesting that it even says that on the BRD article. I have fixed the English in this article so it's written in native English. I have also improved the article with an extensive amount of references. If you don't want to be bothered fixing it, take your problem with me up elsewhere please.

Edit or improve this article or naff off. It is a somewhat important article for photographers. Just because you don't like photography it doesn't make the article technical, there are far more technical articles on Wikipedia. It's not perfect, but it's better than it was. 120.22.5.202 (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The problem is that the recent additions are unsourced and the style and tone isn't ideal either. As I said on my talk page, please see WP:EXPERT for why you cannot add large chunks of unsourced material and expect other users to go along with it.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 10:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply