Talk:Half-sword

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

wouldn't {{martialartsproject}} be a better fit here? dab (𒁳) 21:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Half-sword, in 14th- to 16th-century fencing with the longswords, refers to the technique of gripping the central part of the sword blade with the left hand" I take it this was only done while wearing gauntlets?Heqwm (talk) 09:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, it's a technique with the hand actually. You do not use force with the left hand, you only use it as a 'guide.' As long as the sword does NOT slide in the hand, you will not be cut. 68.51.194.203 (talk) 03:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

His grace caresseth

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sordidly sesquipedalian salutations, as per usual, you poor, woefully neglected article.

If I could, I would append a stub-designation to you--not to say that other people haven't already--but, as of yet, I haven't found quite the appropriate subcategory of stub under which to place you.

Yes, yes, it's all very droll for people to question the bluntness of European swords due to European armor, but, if we could bring to you prominence, all that gibbering apocrypha would be quickly expunged from the public's perception. Sure, even most military historians are unfamiliar with you, but you did play quite a prominent role in battling armored opponents for a fair while, there--before armored opponents disappeared entirely, of course.

Someone really needs to mention how the mordhau wasn't your only technique, too--don't they know that you can grip it with two hands? They seem to think that the ricasso would ever be used in only one hand, too--as if. What would be the point of that? You may as well just put that hand under the guard.

I don't necessarily blame these individuals--mostly because they heard these things from other individuals, who, in turn, heard it from other individuals, in an ever-pullulating cycle of misinformation--but I hope they're acquiescent about this whole affair.

I wouldn't to wax didactic with you too grossly without any sources to yet proffer, however, so, for now, let this letter serve as a portent of things to come.

Trust in me, oh piteous stub, and heights even the celestials only dream of shall be yours to attain. Ghost Lourde (talk) 02:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic