Talk:Halloween (2018 film)/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Some Dude From North Carolina in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lirim.Z (talk · contribs) 13:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Has been sitting for a while, reviewing in the next two days.--Lirim | Talk 13:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Lead and infobox
edit- Is there a reason you only have one source in the lead?
- Non-free media information and use rationale looks good
Plot
edit- No issues
Cast
edit- No issues
Production
edit- Nevertheless, two days after its release The Weinstein Company -> missing a comma
- franchise in the 2010's Weinstein insisted -> missing a comma
- On June 15, 2015, The Weinstein Company -> No reason to link to the Weinstein Company twice
- Link to Russellville, Illinois
- Carpenter said that he was impressed with the pitch presented by the co-writers, solicited by Jason Blum, proclaiming that "They get it." -> Qoute needs a ref
Music
edit- All music is composed by John Carpenter, Cody Carpenter and Daniel Davies.; Tracklist and lenght -> Ref needed
Release
edit- No issue
Reception
edit- The ref states that the movie grossed $255.6 million, an additional 130k from a 2020 re-release
- Worldwide, it earned more than around $100 million -> did it earn more or around?
- link to Our Culture Mag and should be in italics
Sequels
editReferences
edit- Linking is super inconsistent, sometimes you link to stuff, you write websites different in refs
- Ref 4: Yahoo Sports; same ref as Ref 34, qoute not really needed
- Ref 5: Link to Screen Rant
- Ref 6: CINEMABLEND -> Cinemablend MOS:Caps
- Ref 15, 30, 39, 40, 43, 57, 69, 88, 93, 95, 108,: Bloody Disgusting -> Bloody Disgusting; You link to the website in Ref 43, 55, 57, , but in no other, why? Also is it written with ! or without?
- Ref 16: Has no work/publisher
- Ref 20: Date format, link to JoBlo.com
- Ref 21: MOS:Caps
Not done - It's one word. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 22:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ref 22: Link to Whatculture
- Ref 23: Link to TheWrap
- Not done - It's one word. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 22:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ref 27: (–) not (-)
- Ref 28: Link to The Guardian
- Ref 29: Link to Rotten Tomatoes
- Ref 32: MOS:Caps
- Not done - It's one word. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 22:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ref 33: IndieWire not Indiwire
- Ref 36: Link to ComingSoon.com
- Ref 44: Add the author
- Ref 45: Add the author, link to JoBlo
- Ref 46: Author, has no work/publisher
- Ref 47: Work and author
- Ref 50: Link to Screen Rant
- Ref 58, 60, 63: Halloween Daily or Halloweendailynews.com?
Done Changed to Halloween Daily News. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 22:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ref 62: Link to JoBlo
- Ref 64: Author and link to MovieWeb
- Ref 65: Author and link to Entertainment Weekly
- Ref 68: Link to Filmmaker
- Ref 71: {{Template:cite tweet}}
- Ref 73: lastname, surname, link to Screen Rant
- Ref 74: {{Template:Cite instagram}}
- Ref 76: lastname, surname
- Ref 83: lastname, surname, remove that (CONTRIBUTER)
- Ref 85: Billboard
- Ref 86: Link to Variety
- Ref 89: Has no work/publisher
- Ref 90: (–) not (-), has no work/publisher
- Ref 91: Link to Polygon
- Ref 92: Link to Digital Spy
- Ref 96: Link to The Wall Street Journal
- Ref 101: (–) not (-), has no work/publisher
- Ref 105: Variety
- Ref 109: Link to Dread Central, MOS:Caps
- Ref 113: Has no work/publisher, missing author
- Ref 114: Author
- Ref 118: Author
- Ref 121, 122: Link to Collider
- Ref 124: MOS:Caps
- Not done - It's one word. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 23:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is what I saw, also sometimes you link to the publishers for the sources, sometimes not — The references are very inconsistent, but not a reason to fail a very good article. I grant you seven days to fix the minor issue in the article and basically all the refs.--Lirim | Talk 21:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Doing... Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 23:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)- @Lirim.Z: All done with these 22 edits. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 23:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed one little mistake. Happy to pass this article. — Lirim | Talk 17:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: Thanks for passing the article but I've noticed you missed some steps from WP:Good article nominations/Instructions#Passing, such as editing the talk page and adding the film to WP:Good articles/Media and drama#Film. Additionally, though its appreciated, it's better to let the bot add the "good-article-symbol" to the page rather than adding it manually. Just wanted to let you know. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 17:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: Since it's been about an hour since I left my comment above (and since you "thanked me" for it), I just wanted to know if you were planning to finish the review today? Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 18:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: Thanks for passing the article but I've noticed you missed some steps from WP:Good article nominations/Instructions#Passing, such as editing the talk page and adding the film to WP:Good articles/Media and drama#Film. Additionally, though its appreciated, it's better to let the bot add the "good-article-symbol" to the page rather than adding it manually. Just wanted to let you know. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 17:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed one little mistake. Happy to pass this article. — Lirim | Talk 17:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: All done with these 22 edits. Some Dude From NCwanna talk? 23:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
