Talk:Halocene

The band exists and should be allowed to have an article.

I am working on setting up a fully detailed and cited article. The work in progress is sufficient to not just be redirected to the snip-it about the controversy on the masked singer page. Brian.butt (talk) 00:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Discogs is confirmed to be an unreliable source as per WP:RSDISCOGS. This is the only source I could see you keep using that is confirmed to be unreliable. Second, you have been told many times to work on the draft; the article attempts you have been making have not demonstrated our notability criteria for music biographies. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

There has been a lot of work put into this article and it has valid sources. Concrete Castles is article is not being deleted and this one is. Please explain why before deleting this page again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian.butt (talk • contribs) 04:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

The fact that a band with multiple tours including internationally is not considered to be sufficiently notable to warrant an article despite the fact that they've got more discography and have played more tours than most of the bands in Alternative rock groups from Arizona seems like a clear indicator that the criteria for notability warrants reconsideration for an era where radio and physical album sales are increasingly less relevant. It honestly would've been better to delete than redirect so at least somebody can attempt an article that meets the standards, now we're left with a protected redirect to a minor social media spat because apparently that's more notable. --Msgerbs (talk) 01:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Msgerbs, You are correct there is a draft that you could try and add to and submit to try and override the draconian rule of these editors. Brian.butt (talk) 05:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)