Talk:Hampus Hellekant
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Slander
editThe article was serious slander. Statements about crimes never comitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.231.19 (talk) 23:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Slander? What would you claim to be not true? Everything has been confirmed by many independent sources apart from the Swedish courts themselves. --Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
New name
editWhat is the reason for including his new name in the Wikipedia article? Ulner (talk) 23:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't get any answer to my question, and have hence deleted his new name from the article. Ulner 19:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Is there any reason to not include his new name? Jobjörn (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- I can find no reason not to publish his new name. It shall remain.--Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Is there any reason to not include his new name? Jobjörn (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Slander
editWikipedia is not for slander. Since nobody objected I edited the article. For full discussion se swedish wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.10.143.118 (talk) 13:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that Wikipedia shouldn't be used for slander. This however is as far away from slander as can be. --Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Slander
editArticle contains statements about convictions that are not true. It also contains emotional descriptions that does not belong in a encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.10.143.118 (talk) 15:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just because you keep repeating it doesn't make it so. It's slanderous that you insist on this being slanderous.--Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
To Hampus Hellekant
editI have requested deletion of the article twice [1][2]; to no avail, even though I asked the admin to reconsider and explained the situation. I have also requested Wikipedia:Oversight to delete my revisions. Plrk (talk) 11:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- The votes are in and they are not in your favor, the facts are facts and can not be removed just because you for dim reasons wish it so.--Karl Svensson (talk) 11:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)