Talk:Hand-in-waistcoat

Latest comment: 6 months ago by 136.169.55.159 in topic The hidden hand as a Masonic symbol

Buzz Aldrin on the Moon

edit

Photographed by Neil Armstrong: Aldrin_Apollo_11_original.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kool-user-name (talkcontribs) 13:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Because it's a Freemason symbol. 79.106.203.62 (talk) 23:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

On the Spot (2011 TV series) and hand in the waistcoat

edit

The On the Spot (2011 TV series) had a section on why many portraits used the hand in the waistcoat to save money because hands, arms, ans legs cost extra to paint. Thus the term "it will cost you an arm and a leg" was a painters term and the real reason for hiding hands in portraits.Septagram (talk) 06:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

The hidden hand as a Masonic symbol

edit

See https://www.metabunk.org/can-someone-please-debunk-the-masonic-hidden-hand-sign.t1278/ -- œ 04:45, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, afaik this is a symbol of the Masonic lodge of York. I've seen Kim Jong-un walking with a hand-in-waistcoat position too. It is suspicious that it's nowhere mentioned in the article. 212.186.15.63 (talk) 15:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, everyone knows this is a Freemason symbol, not a "genteel" one! 79.106.203.62 (talk) 23:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
The link to Freemasonry should at least be mentioned in the article. PDF page 9 (numbered 87) could prove to be a good source: https://www.bu.edu/arion/files/2014/03/Gershman-web-version.pdf 136.169.55.159 (talk) 19:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 14:21, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Chiton or Toga?

edit

Aeschines, according to the source cites, speaks of a toga, not a chiton. Unlike the chiton, the toga is a cumbersome garment so that the hand-in-waistcoat gesture makes sense for it. Source should be checked, I suspect that there is a misunderstanding or poor summary of the ancient Greco-Roman literature on this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:20:704C:140A:D0AA:EAFF:FE77:5570 (talk) 14:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The toga was a Roman clothing. It was not yet existent in Aeschines' times, and if it existed, he would not have worn it, because he was a Greek. 2003:ED:B743:900:3B:30A2:8436:C8BB (talk) 18:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply