There seems to be some disagreement about stubs. The update to start was reverted (GF) under the notion that the article should be a stub since it must be expanded. It is almost always a good idea to expand articles with meaningful information. This, however, does not necessitate keeping an article at stub status even at 13 full sentences! Please also note that the sentences cover the core, or much of it, and not some of affair, a situation that could justify keeping a longer article at stub status. gidonb (talk) 09:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
