Talk:Hans von Spakovsky
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWow! Talk about a biased POV! 68.45.104.173 (talk) 06:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it really is a hatchet piece, even by Wikipedia standards. CsikosLo (talk) 17:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
They think they're doing god's work so they really can't help themselves. Alas, what this does to trust and integrity is another matter. We're entering a dangerous period in human history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:5D80:F29:7423:898A:4452:D835 (talk) 17:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC) ___________________________________________________________________________________________
I am so much more attractive than Spakovsky and I blog, also.
Why can't I get a high-falutin job? Why am I a working-poor dreg?
Does one have to be an entertainment star, a lawyer or a surgeon to make a living nowadays?
OH, that's right.... folks in my class compete directly with mega-millions of ILLEGAL ALIENS!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obbop (talk • contribs) 18:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Why is there a link to the *German Nobility* page at the bottom of the topic page? Is Mr. von Spakovsky in some way descended from or related to a German noble family? If so, then some small mention ought to be made on the page, IMO. 204.86.42.50 (talk) 21:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC) ______________________________________________________________________________________________
Sources
editIt seems to me that there are a substantial number of appropriate, reliable sources which could be incorporated into this article. The article seems to lack detail on one of the most notable aspects of the subject, which is the dispute over his nomination by George W. Bush to the Federal Election Commission. I've collected a few potential sources below, with the aim of expanding and improving our coverage.
Justice Department tenure:
- Eggen, Dan (January 23, 2006). "Politics Alleged In Voting Cases". Washington Post. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
- Eggen, Dan (November 17, 2005). "Criticism of Voting Law Was Overruled". Washington Post. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
- Gordon, Greg (May 20, 2007). "Efforts to stop 'voter fraud' may have curbed legitimate voting". McClatchy Newspapers. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
Confirmation hearings:
- Goldfarb, Zachary (June 8, 2007). "Hearing on FEC Pick Could Add Fuel to Debate Over Justice Dept". Washington Post. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
- Gordon, Greg (June 13, 2007). "Lawyer can't recall his role in controversial policies". McClatchy Newspapers. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
- Vogel, Kenneth (September 26, 2007). "Dems move controversial FEC nominee". Politico. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
- Stump, M. K. (June 13, 2007). "The grilling of von Spakovsky". Salon.com. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
Opinion/Editorial (may or may not be suitable, would need direct attribution):
- "In Defense of Voting Rights". New York Times. November 5, 2007. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
- "Another Sorry Ascension". New York Times. June 14, 2007. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
- "Conspiring Against the Voters". New York Times. December 31, 2005. Retrieved July 22, 2011.
Any other thoughts, or sources, are welcome. MastCell Talk 18:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Text and/or other creative content from [nil ] was copied or moved into [[]]. The former page's [ history] now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Created some material at this article and moved some to the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Created sentence and source at the John Fund article and copied part to here. Activist (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Slight revision of copying notice. Activist (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hans von Spakovsky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070625024429/http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/letter-rules-vonspakovsky/?resultpage=1& to http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/letter-rules-vonspakovsky/?resultpage=1&
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 29 October 2017 (UTC)