Talk:Hansa-Brandenburg W.29

CE

Auto-edded, dupe wl check, a few typos repaired, all suggestive. Keith-264 (talk) 11:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hansa-Brandenburg W.29/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 03:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 03:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Comments as follows:

Background and description

• The fuselage retained its depth after of the rear cockpit...: should that be "aft of the rear..."

Operational history

• link Zeebrugge
• destroy naval mines by gunfire after the war that included 25 unarmed W.29s.: if they were unarmed how could they destroy the mines by gunfire?
• The Hungarian Soviet Republic ordered production of the W.29 at UFAG to restart.: something missing here, maybe "restart [or rebuild] its air force?"
• Even though it is briefly touched upon in the operators section, it seems like the World War 1 section needs a mention of when the production examples first started reaching service with the Naval Air Service.
  • Deliveries began in April, I don't know when they began to be delivered to combat units--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

References

• Which Owers ref is cite 11?
• Cite 18 doesn't need the year as a disambig, there is only one Mikesh & Abe listed in the bibliography

• The Năstase ref appears to be a book, shouldn't it be listed in the bibliography?
  • It's a magazine article to which I cannot get access.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Other stuff

• Dupe link: cockpit
• Image tags OK

That's all for now. Zawed (talk) 10:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the review; see if my changes are satisfactory--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Changes look fine, so passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)