This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Hanyusuchus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Nah. I don't think it really is a common name. Prehistoric species typically don't have common names. The scientific study describing it never uses the term "Chinese gharial". And when the term was used in those articles you linked above, it wasn't necessarily clear whether it was using the term as a name, or just as a general descriptor of the species based on its range. Cougroyalty (talk) 22:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
In principle even being prehistoric does not automatically exclude something from having a common name provided it is referred as such additionally to the scientific name. This applies to a lot of Ice Age fauna, terror birds, entelodonts got a good couple of common names and so do some animals from Messel. However in this case I'm inclined to agree that "Chinese gharial" and its use in the articles is not clear enough yet and too vague regarding its use as a proper common name or simple descriptor. At least not until the name gets picked up more commonly. Armin Reindl (talk) 14:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply