This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The supposed letter from Turner to Wolff is clumsy forgery. This can already be seen in the many grammar, spelling and semantic mistakes the writer made. --41.151.56.108 (talk) 19:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
The thing is that this letter is riddled with so many formal mistakes that one can only conclude that it is a forgery. After all he did have a phD in Law and at this stage the requirements for this achievement were very high. Is there a reliable source for the authenticity of the letter? I'd doubt the reliability if there was. 105.12.4.162 (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
